Showing posts with label M.S.SUBBULAKSHMI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label M.S.SUBBULAKSHMI. Show all posts

Wednesday, 8 June 2022

M.S.SUBBULAKSHMI -MANI IYER THE DARKSIDE OF HER LIFE

 

M.S.SUBBULAKSHMI -MANI IYER

THE DARKSIDE OF HER LIFE

வாலிப சுதந்திர மீறல்
When it's two intelligent teen age girls,
it's quirky,funny and rebellious.
Great Dancer Balaasaraswathy and
Outstanding singer M.S.Subbulakshmi
in their teens.

இந்த புகைப்படம் பாலசரஸ்வதி பற்றி அவருடைய மகளின் கணவர் டக்ளஸ் எம். நைட் எழுதியுள்ள நூலிலேயே உள்ளது.  
டக்ளஸ் தன் நூலில் இந்த புகைப்படத்திற்கு முக்கியத்துவம் கொடுத்திருக்கிறார்.
“பாலசரஸ்வதி அவர் கலையும் வாழ்வும்” என்ற நூல்.
தமிழ் மொழிபெயர்ப்பாக க்ரியா ராமகிருஷ்ணன் வெளியிட்டிருக்கிறார். 
புகைப்படத்தின் கீழ் உள்ள குறிப்பு :
பதின்ம வயது தோழிகள் எம். எஸ். சுப்புலட்சுமியும் பால சரஸ்வதியும்
கட்டுப்பாடு மிகுந்த குடும்பங்களிலிருந்து வந்த இந்த இருவரும் தங்கள் சுதந்திரத்தை வலியுறுத்தும் நோக்கத்தில் இந்தப் படத்தை ரகசியமாக எடுத்துக்கொண்டார்கள்.
மேற்கத்திய உடையணிந்தும், சிகரெட் பிடிப்பது போன்ற பாவனையுடனும்.


திரையுலகத்திற்கு கொஞ்சமும் குறைந்ததல்ல அந்தக்கால சங்கீத உலக Gossips.
ஜி.என்.பாலசுப்ரமண்யம் ’சகுந்தலை’ படத்தில் எம்.எஸ்.சுப்புலட்சுமியுடன் ஜோடியாய் நடித்த போதே இருவருக்கும் காதல், தொடர்பு என்று சங்கீத உலகம் முணுமுணுத்தது.
'சகுந்தலை 'படத்தில் ஆணழகன் ஜென்டில்மேன் ஜி என் பாலசுப்ரமணியமும் இசைக்குயில் எம் .எஸ் சுப்புலக்ஷ்மியும் இணைந்து பாடும் காதல் பாடல்.
எம் எஸ் : பிரேமையில் யாவும் மறந்தேனே
ஜி என் பி : ஜீவனமுனதன்பே
எம் எஸ் : என் அன்பே
ஆயிரம் முறை கேட்டாலும் திகட்டாத பாடல்.
ஜி.என்.பியை அவருடைய சிஷ்யை எம்.எல்.வசந்தகுமாரியுடன் இணைத்தே பேசப்பட்டதுண்டு.
There is an optical illusion about every celebrity.
நாதஸ்வர சக்ரவர்த்தி டி.என்.ராஜரத்தினம்பிள்ளைக்கு எம்.எஸ் மீது இருந்த sexual obsession. தூக்கிக்கொண்டு போய்விட்டார். அப்புறம் தான் கல்கி சதாசிவம் கல்யாணம் செய்து கொண்டார் என்று மிகப்பெரியவர்களே இன்று சொல்வதுண்டு.
அந்தக்காலத்தில் Me too பரபரப்பு புகார்களுக்கு முகாந்திரம், மார்க்கமிருக்கவில்லை?
மதுரை மணி ஐயர்.
தி.ஜானகிராமன் இவருடைய ரசிகர்.
இதை திருச்சி ரசிகரஞ்சனி சபாவில் மெம்பராய் இருந்த போது வையச்சேரி தேவாரம் பாலசுப்ரமண்யம் என்னிடம் உறுதிப்படுத்தினார். எனக்கு சிலிர்ப்பாய் இருந்தது. தி.ஜா போலவே எனக்கும் மதுரை மணி ஐயர் பாட்டு ரொம்ப பிடிக்கும்.
அவருடைய பாடல் கேசட் இருபதுக்கு மேல் என்னிடம் இருந்தன. அவர் குரலில் வராளி கா வா வா, கரகரப்ரியாவில் சக்கனி ராஜா, மோகனம் கபாலி, சௌராஷ்ட்ரா ராக சூர்யமூர்த்தெ, இன்னும்.. எப்போ வருவாரோ, தாயே யசோதா..இப்படி கேட்க காதுகளுக்கு என்ன பாக்யம்.
மதுரை மணி ஐயர் இந்த பூவுலகில் ஒரு ஐம்பத்தாறு வருடங்கள் தான் இருந்தார். ஒரு அரை நூற்றாண்டு வாழ்க்கையில் அந்த சாதனை இன்னமும் சுகிர்தமாக, சாசுவதமாக.
பிரபல கல்லூரி முதல்வராய் இருந்த ஒரு மாமி ஒரு தகவலை சொன்னார்.அவர் ரிட்டயர் ஆன பிறகு இன்னொரு தனியார் கல்லூரியில் முதல்வரானார். அவருடைய இளைய சகோதரர் கூட எனக்கு கல்லூரியில் ஆசிரியராய் இருந்திருக்கிறார்.
அந்த கல்லூரி முதல்வரின் பெற்றோர் மதுரையில் பெருமாள் கோவில் தெருவில் குடியிருந்திருக்கிறார்கள். குழந்தையாக இருக்கும் காலம் தொட்டு மதுரை வாசி அவர்.
கல்லூரி முதல்வர் சிறுமியாக ஒன்றாம் வகுப்பு, இரண்டாம் வகுப்பு படிக்கிற காலத்தில் அங்கே பக்கத்தில் ஒரு வீட்டில் ஒரு மாமி இருந்திருக்கிறார். அவர் சங்கீதம், பரதநாட்டியம் இவற்றில் தேர்ந்தவர். குழந்தைகளிடம் மிகவும் அன்பாய் இருப்பார். குழந்தையாய் இருந்த இந்த முதல்வருக்கு அந்த பக்கத்தாத்து மாமியை மிகவும் பிடிக்குமாம். குழந்தையும் தெய்வமும் கொண்டாடும் இடத்தில் தானே.
ஆனால் ஒரு சிக்கல். பிரின்சிபால் மாமியின் தாயாருக்கு அந்த குறிப்பிட்ட பக்காத்தாத்து மாமியை சுத்தமாய் பிடிக்காதாம். குழந்தையை “ எங்கடி போயிருந்தே அபிஸ்டு..சொல்லேன்டி ஜடம்” ஒன்றாம் வகுப்பு படிக்கும் குழந்தை முகம் கலவரமாகி என்ன சொல்லலாம் என்று தவிக்கும் போதே “வாயில என்னடி பட்சணம் ஒட்டிண்டிருக்கிறது. ஏண்டி அவ ஆத்துக்குத் தானே போயிருந்தே..கிரகசாரம்.” குழந்தை பயத்தோடு தலையை ஆட்டும். உடனே அதன் அம்மா தொடையில் நல்லா கிள்ளி விட்டு “ இனிமே அவ ஆத்துப்போவியா? எத்தன தடவ சொல்லியிருக்கேன். போகாதடின்னு..ஏண்டி” என்று மீண்டும் நறுக்கென்று தொடையில் கிள்ளி விடுவாராம்.
நான் கேட்டேன். “ ஒங்க தாயாருக்கு ஏன் அந்த பக்கத்தாத்து மாமி மேல இவ்வளவு துவேசம்”
காலேஜ் பிரின்சிபால் சொன்னார். “ அந்த மாமி சங்கீத வித்வான் மதுரை மணி ஐயரின் Concubine. மணி ஐயர் அந்த மாமியை வச்சிண்டிருந்தார். His significant other.
அவ ரொம்ப நல்லவ. எனக்கு ரொம்ப பிடிக்கும். ஆனா என்ன செய்ய. Social Stigma. குழந்தையா இருக்கறச்ச எனக்கு என்ன தெரியும். அப்புறம் ரகசியமா தான் அம்மாவுக்கு தெரியாம தான் அந்த மாமியை போய் பார்ப்பேன். அவ விளயாட்டு ஜாமானெல்லாம் எனக்கு தருவா. பட்சணமெல்லாம் ரொம்ப ருசியாயிருக்கும். நல்லா நெறய்ய கதைகள் சொல்வா. ரொம்ப நல்ல மாமி..”
இதை சொல்லும்போதே கல்லூரி முதல்வரின் கண்கள் குளம் கட்டி விட்டன.
’’மணி ஐயருக்கு குஷ்டம் உண்டு. அப்படியிருந்தும் எங்க தெருவில் இருந்த அந்த பக்கத்தாத்து மாமிக்கு அவர் மீது பிரேமை என்பதை விட பக்தி.. ரொம்ப நன்னாயிருப்பா. எவ்வளவு பெரிய தியாகம்”
தி.ஜானகிராமன் “மணம்” என்ற ஒரு சிறுகதை எழுதியிருக்கிறார் என்பது நினைவுக்கு வந்தது.
அந்த ’மணம்’ கதையில் வருகிற நீலா என்ற துணை நடிகை ஒரு Sex worker.
அவள் ஒரு இரவு இருட்டறையில் சந்தித்த மனிதர் குஷ்ட ரோகி என்பது மறு நாள் தெரிய வரும்போதே அதிர்ச்சியாகி அருவருப்பினால் தவிப்பாள்.
நீலாவுக்குநெஞ்சை அடைத்து , தொண்டை வலித்து, கண்ணீர் தளும்பி, உதட்டை கடித்து, அழுகை பீறிக்கொண்டு வரும்.
ஒரே ஒரு இரவுக்கே அப்படி.


To the love of my life..
To my love who has taken over my life, body and soul..
To the person who had taken hold of my life and yet allowed me to languish..

All I want is to feast my eyes upon you. You on the other hand would not even raise your head to look at me. Can you fathom how this torments my mind? I simply wither away.

I hug your photograph and weep. Would that photograph speak to me, my kanna?

In my house there is no happiness for me. There are only problems … My mother is likely to be alive only for a few more years. My elder brother is my enemy. The younger sister is all right … I will not hide anything from you. I have not been happy so far. But I am alive because I am here. 

Kanna, to write all this I found some time only today … One thing is the absolute truth. Your happiness is mine, kanna … You may ask me what I was doing earlier. I suffered.

Even when the film is over,I will not get separated from you. Please do not unnecessarily test me. After the film is over, we will be together … The love I have for you will never change. After I die, you will realize that. My life from birth has been one of travails … Naan paavi.. I must have committed great sins to suffer like this. If I had stayed in Madurai, I would have died long ago … there is nobody to whom I can speak and cry out. I dream of you daily. Do you? … When you happen to touch me in the course of our acting together, I think to myself, ‘This is my Lord’ and then feel elated. I don't want anything else in life. I only want your love. 

If you are generally happy with me, that will give me the greatest pleasure. I do not know what people back at home would do to me. It was predicted by the astrologer that the immortal Pushpavanam would have a long life. Yet he died at a young age. I will go in the same manner. It is better that I am dead.

At least now, when the duet is picturised will you avoid the natural inclination of physical contact?

The kutchery was no good. No music other than yours gets into my ears. This is the unvarnished truth. I must sing exactly like you. Even after the film is over, I am sure you are going to continue to teach me music.

Henceforth even for a moment I will not be separated from you.

From Kunju, who worships you..
My love, my very life, I kiss your handwriting and your music..
I will never leave you, en Kanna..

~ M.S.Subbulakshmi

Madurai Mani Iyer's significant other was a saint, precisely.

What made M.S. Subbulakshmi a national icon

M.S. at a radio recording

M.S. at a radio recording | Photo Credit: Pic from the book

Let’s take a quick offhand count of the number of books that have been written on M.S. Subbulakshmi, the maestra of Carnatic music. MS – A Life In Music by TJS George, MS and Radha, A Saga of Steadfast Devotion by Gowri Ramnarayan, The Madras Music Quartet by Indira Menon, Lakshmi Vishwanathan’s Kunjamma – Ode to a Nightingale and Family Pride: MS Subbulakshmi , Lakshmi Devanath’s illustrated short biography, and Song of Surrender, A Centenary Tribute to MS Subbulakshmi by Savitha Narasimhan, Gowri Ramnarayan and V. Ramnarayan, are some. This is apart from books in regional languages: at least four books have been published in Kannada alone, besides a translation of TJS George’s book, in the last five years.

The life and music of M.S. Subbulakshmi continues to capture the interest of several writers. Who she was, where she came from, and what she became forms the canvas of most books. If the journey of M.S.’s life is the journey of her music, the reverse is true as well. Of Gifted Voice: The Life and Art of M.S. Subbulakshmi by Keshav Desiraju (Harper Collins) — the latest book on the musician — tells her story yet again. It is neither the linear narration of Indira Menon nor is it the reinvigorating telling of George, who took advantage of his position as someone who strayed into music.

Keshav Desiraju, a retired civil servant, educated at Harvard and Cambridge, lays out facts that you find in other books on the musician, but his quiet and responsible understanding of these facts builds a meaningful difference, especially in a world filled with noisy debates.

It is all about author perspective and Desiraju does two interesting things: with extensive and meticulous research, he reconstructs the artistic richness of the times in which M.S. lived. The book abounds with hundreds of wonderful stories and anecdotes, some heard, some unheard. Introducing you to all the extraordinary women musicians and dancers who were contemporaries of his protagonist — in Hindustani and Carnatic worlds — Desiraju asks us, even as he explores, what made M.S. special, a national icon?

The book layers her musical competence alongside the remarkable Rajam Pushpavanam and N.C. Vasantakokilam (“…the only two singers who had the potential to rival Subbulakshmi, and if the fates had been less wilful, to overtake her.”) K.B. Sundarambal (‘a superb musician with an enslaving, rapturous voice...”), Philomena Thamboochetty, D.K. Pattammal (“rare specimen of voice, fresh and untainted, pure and healthy”), Balasaraswati, Roshanara Begum, Mallika Pukhraj, and Gangubai Hangal, among others, who were in no way inferior to the musical prowess of M.S. but did not scale her heights. In bringing all these women into the narrative, Desiraju seems to ask how M.S. became the face of India. What made her the favourite of the masses? From Nehru to Mountbatten to Rajaji, she was feted by the political-cultural-social elite of India. What role did Sadashivam play in her life and what kind of choices did she make? The narrative probes these complex realms.

Secondly, Desiraju presents the world’s perceptions of M.S. through a series of reviews, reports and opinions that were published at different periods of her life and career. A rasika compares her popularity with other musicians: “M.S. challenged them all for the attention and affection of music buffs... the joy of listening to M.S. was an experience in itself.”

There are many statements like this, but there are also unhappy ones. For instance, when M.S. plunged into the Tamil Isai movement and presented a Tamil repertoire, or when she became the embodiment of bhakti and presented ‘devotional’ songs (‘shrill and high-pitched’ as one critic said) she also elicited unfavourable responses.

One sensitive listener listening to an AIR concert in 1968 said: “From M.S. we seek music which soars aloft, not the kind of pieces carefully chosen by those who have lost the voices of their youth.” Apart from those that directly reacted to her music, there were also reports that commented thus, following a concert in Delhi, in 1947: “Oddly and sadly, the presence of politicians, businessmen and other socially prominent people, without any sense of musical appreciation, was a feature of M.S. concerts, to which Sadashivam was obsessively attached.”

M.S., slowly and steadily, shut the doors on the world she came from. The world that she now entered watches her ‘refashioning’ keenly. The book, therefore, builds an objective narrative in which you have social details, people’s opinions as well as the author’s suggestions.

M.S. with Jawaharlal Nehru at the December 1947 release of ‘Meera.’

M.S. with Jawaharlal Nehru at the December 1947 release of ‘Meera.’

The disintegration of the Devadasi system, its impact on the artistes and their abundant cultural heritage, the new patronage, the eventual institutionalisation, the nationalist project, Gandhi... the book discusses all this at length. There are precious nuggets that have the potential to become full-fledged studies. Writing about Dhanammal’s superlative music, Desiraju cites an advertisement for her concert on July 16, 1933: “Men can get the best seats for a rupee but women only the second-best at half a rupee!” Ironically, this is for Dhanammal, who refused to conform to male standards of music. In an “extraordinary diatribe” titled, ‘Notes on music, women singers,’ C.R. Srinivasa Iyengar writes, “... a lady singing Pallavi recalls to me the picture of a dog trained to walk on hind legs — it is ungainly, uncouth, unseemly and uncalled for. Her native element is padams, keertanams or erotic pieces.” He later wrote a series of articles for The Hindu in 1925 against women singers titled ‘Music and Sex’. Desiraju says the content of most is “unprintable”.

On the other side, the book is also a treasure trove of generous moments — there are recollections of how Omkarnath Thakur came to listen to M.S., how Semmangudi Srinivasa Iyer said that none can sing the Melakarta Ragamalika like her. Though Palghat Mani Iyer, the great mridanga vidwan, never played in a public concert for M.S., he said in an 1978 interview that Ariyakudi Ramanuja Iyengar, Chembai Vaidyanatha Bhagavathar and M.S. Subbulakshmi were the three artistes with outstanding voices who sang straight to the audience. It is also true that M.S. rarely chose to have a female accompanist — was it a choice made by M.S. herself? It is hard to tell.

As Desiraju suggests, one may disagree with the choices the singer made, her music may not gain total approval of the connoisseur, but she truly was one of India’s finest artistes. Her dedication and commitment to art are unquestionable. Desiraju quotes historian Ramachandra Guha, who argued for the Bharat Ratna to be conferred on M.S. and Lata Mangeshkar: “We know them as M.S. and Lata, not out of easy familiarity, but because we love, cherish and honour them, because we cannot imagine life or India without them.”

The life and times of M.S. are exciting: history takes control of her music and eventually she becomes her music. There will be more books, surely.

Tuesday, 23 February 2021

WHY M.S.SUBBULAKSHMI RAN OUT OF MADURAI TOWARDS MADRAS

 


WHY M.S.SUBBULAKSHMI RAN OUT 

OF MADURAI TOWARDS MADRAS


Why did MS Subbulakshmi run away from her mother’s attempt to find a man for her?
In Shanmugavadivu’s world things were preordained and all lines clearly drawn. What was familiar was what was good. A wealthy husband was the most thoughtful gift a mother could provide for her daughter. In her opinion, although Sadasivam possessed a car, he was certainly not wealthy. He talked big but he was only an employee of someone else.
When her daughter was already a known musician and pretty too, why should she settle for such an ordinary person instead of an owner of mills that employed thousands or a zamindar holding vast tracts of land? She had found a handsome raja for her daughter once, but the girl had proved headstrong then and did not follow her mother’s advice. Perhaps she was too young then to know what was good for her.
Circumstances must be different now, for Subbulakshmi had been exposed to the big world of Madras and had personally experienced the dangers lurking there. She was sure to be more receptive to advice this time.
Shanmugavadivu had laboured hard to promote her and she would know that her mother had only her best interests in mind. Shanmugavadivu’s view of life was uncomplicated and it did not take her long to identify a rich Chettiar (a member of a business community) as a suitable match for her daughter. She asked Subbulakshmi to move in with him without further ado.
What was Subbulakshmi to do under the pressure that was mounted on her?
Not only was her mother the only authority she had known; the rules that governed Shanmugavadivu’s thoughts were the only ones she had followed in her life span of twenty years. The question of seeking outside opinion never arose because there were no teachers or friends to whom she could turn.
Besides, Shanmugavadivu had not proposed anything out of the ordinary; Nattukottai Chettiars, who were known to be enterprising and lavish, were the men most in demand in Shanmugavadivu’s world. Subbulakshmi knew that her mother was doing what was expected of her, and she was doing it well. All reason was for her mother’s proposal, but all her instincts were against it. Eventually, instinct got the better of reason.
Different versions of how Subbulakshmi responded to her mother’s initiative have done the rounds. The version provided by CP Seshadri, the famous “Master” of the Indian Express family in Madras, can be considered a reliable one. During that period, Seshadri was tuned in to the happenings in Tamil social and political circles in Madras, personally knew all the dramatis personae involved and was not given to gossip. He was eighty-one when he narrated his story to the author.
According to him, Subbulakshmi told her mother that she did not like the idea of moving in with the Chettiar.
Before her mother could take any further action, Subbulakshmi removed her ornaments, slipped out of the house quietly one night, and hopped onto a train to Madras. She knew two trustworthy persons in the city: a Congress nationalist involved with khaddar promotion and Sadasivam.
She boarded a jutka (a horse carriage) from the railway station to the khaddar official’s house situated in T Nagar. He was a prominent citizen and had helped her in the past by arranging some concerts for her. He was surprised to see her getting down from the jutka in front of his gate and was even more surprised when she told him that she did not wish to go back to her mother. He was truly astonished when she sought his protection. Naturally, he was embarrassed at the thought of having to explain to his wife the sudden appearance of a young girl at their house looking for protection.
Thinking quickly, he got into the same jutka and took Subbulakshmi to Sadasivam’s house in Triplicane. Sadasivam, imbued with a missionary zeal for helping anyone in need, took charge of Subbulakshmi at once. Actually, the “fugitive” from Madurai started living in Sadasivam’s house. Such a state of affairs would soon lead to unforeseen complications, scandal and tragedy, for Sadasivam’s house was only temporarily empty when Subbulakshmi moved in there.
He was a married man with two daughters and his wife was recuperating in her father’s house in a place called Udayarpalayam after her second delivery.
Such details did not deter Sadasivam from providing shelter to someone who had come to his house seeking it. That the person happened to be the singing star who had been the object of a great deal of attention from him only a few months earlier strengthened his resolve to help.
For Sadasivam help meant all-out help. He soon began maintaining a lookout for every opportunity to find work for MS and to promote her as an artiste. The idea of an unusual opening struck him when an enquiry about a serialised novel reached his desk at Ananda Vikatan. The novel was titled Sevasadanam and the man who wanted to buy its film rights was director K Subrahmanyam. Sadasivam happily conducted the negotiations and won the day when he talked the director into parting with a princely fee of Rs 4,000 for film rights.
Then Sadasivam turned his focus to selling a related idea to Subramanyam: why not offer the heroine’s role to MS Subbulakshmi? Subramanyam had, of course, been impressed by the young singer at the 1932 Kumbakonam Mahamaham, but he said he was not all that convinced about her screen potential. The more Sadasivam pressed MS’s case, the more Subramanyam played hard to get. A final round of negotiations followed and this time Subramanyam talked Sadasivam into parting with an undisclosed sum of money for the production of Sevasadanam. In Subramanyam’s opinion, if he lost big money on the film rights deal, he made good money on the MS deal.
The smitten Sadasivam did not think that Subramanyam had smartly turned the tables on him. In fact, he saw the entire transaction as a double victory: it took him closer to MS and it took MS further away from her family in Madurai.
When Shanmugavadivu discovered that her daughter had left home, she realised at once where she could have gone. She sent her son Shaktivel to Madras immediately and he traced her to Sadasivam’s house. Bitter quarrels followed, with the brother repeatedly trying to convince the sister that the Vikatan man would only exploit her and that she should cut him out of her life as quickly as she could. Such altercations only added to Sadasivam’s animosity towards Shanmugavadivu and her son.
For her part, Shanmugavadivu was filled with loathing for Sadasivam and fear for her daughter.
She detested the world of cinema, especially after she played a bit role as a washerwoman in Sangeetha Lava Kusha (1934). She learned enough during that fleeting acquaintance to know that the cinema world was inhabited by “big bad men”. Worse, she was convinced that cinema could destroy her daughter’s musical prowess, reduce her to a common screen singer and ruin her serious classical prospects forever.
Angry and desperate, she began exploring all possible means of retrieving MS from the vicious clutches of Sadasivam and from the ominous tentacles of cinema. She wanted her daughter back in the safe arms of Madurai. The tug of war between Shanmugavadivu and Sadasivam would continue for a while.
What the entire episode revealed more than anything else was that when it came to deciding the course and quality of her life, MS seemed to know what she wanted—at least, what she did not want. Her departure from Madurai and her arrival at Triplicane were both indicative of an inner strength few would have suspected in her. She was not even sure at that point of time about how Sadasivam would behave. Was he just bluster or was there something more substantial in him?
The intensity of his wooing had flattered her and disturbed her simultaneously.
It was clear to her that he was a demanding man, even a difficult man, and sometimes she worried about the steps she had taken. According to one assessment, “at times Subbulakshmi seemed even to want to back out of the relationship in the face of Sadasivam’s possessiveness”. On the other hand, what was the alternative available to her? While admiring the perseverance with which her mother had helped build her career step by step, MS had intuitively turned away from Shanmugavadivu’s idea of ensuring security by courtesy of wealthy benefactors. Anything, she thought, would be preferable to that.
Sadasivam’s presence in her life at that moment of emotional crisis would no doubt have led to a forging of bonds between them. He was at his best while sorting out other people’s crises. He understood the dilemma in which MS was caught. The musical career that had just begun to sprout was her only asset and it was her mother who had brought it to that promising stage. He knew that MS was too inexperienced in the ways of the world to get ahead on her own. The obvious course open to both of them was for Sadasivam to substitute for Shanmugavadivu. He took up the role with relish, while MS drew comfort from having such a worldly-wise man to turn to.
May be an image of 1 person

Wednesday, 22 November 2017

SADASIVAM OF KALKI, HUSBAND OF M.S.SUBBULAKSHMI DIED 1997 NOVEMBER 22



SADASIVAM OF KALKI, 
HUSBAND OF M.S.SUBBULAKSHMI
DIED 1997 NOVEMBER 22




தியாகராஜன் சதாசிவம் (செப்டம்பர் 4, 1902 - நவம்பர் 22, 1997[1]) இந்தியாவின் முன்னணி விடுதலைப் போராட்ட வீரரும், பாடகரும், பத்திரிகையாளரும், திரைப்படத் தயாரிப்பாளரும் ஆவார். இரா. கிருஷ்ணமூர்த்தியுடன் இணைந்து கல்கி வார இதழைத் தொடங்கியவர். கிருஷ்ணமூர்த்தியின் இறப்புக்குப் பின்னர் கல்கி இதழின் ஆசிரியராகப் பணியாற்றியவர். இவர் பிரபல கருநாடக இசைப் பாடகி எம். எஸ். சுப்புலட்சுமியின் கணவர் ஆவார்.
வாழ்க்கைக் குறிப்பு[மூலத்தைத் தொகு]

கல்கி சதாசிவம் திருச்சி ஆங்கரை என்ற ஊரில் தியாகராஜன் ஐயர், மங்களம் ஆகியோரின் 16 பிள்ளைகளில் மூன்றாவதாகப் பிறந்தார். லாலா லஜபதி ராய், பிபின் சந்திர பால், பால கங்காதர திலகர், அரவிந்தர் ஆகியோரின் பேச்சுக்களால் கவரப்பட்ட சதாசிவம் இளம் வயதிலேயே விடுதலை இயக்கத்தில் தன்னை இணைத்துக் கொண்டார். சுப்பிரமணிய சிவாவைக் குருவாக ஏற்றுக் கொண்டார். இதனால் பள்ளியில் இருந்து விலகி பாரத சமாச இயக்கத்தில் இணைந்தார்.[2] பின்னர் இராசகோபாலாச்சாரி, மகாத்மா காந்தி ஆகியோரின் பால் ஈர்க்கப்பட்டு அறப் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டார்.

மூத்த மனைவி அபிதக்குச்சம்பாள் வாயிலாக ராதா, விஜயா ஆகியோர் இவரின் பெண் பிள்ளைகள் ஆவர். 1936 சூலையில் சுப்புலட்சுமியை சந்தித்தார். முதல் மனைவி இறந்ததை அடுத்து சுப்புலட்சுமியை 10 சூலை 1940 அன்று மறுமணம் புரிந்தார்.